Like pretty much every sacred site in Israel, the traditionally celebrated place where Mary was visited by the angel Gabriel to reveal that she would be the mother of the Savior of the word has a big church built right on top of it. The first time we visited Nazareth, we only stopped at Mt. Precipice and didn't drive down into the city and to the church. No one in our group really seemed to mind. The large church was a Roman Catholic basilica, after all, and those apses, naves, murals, windows and crosses can be uncomfortable for the LDS tourist.
A couple of days later, however, we went back to Nazareth for lunch and our guides decided to squeeze in a visit to the church, known as The Church of Annunciation.

A repeat picture of Nazareth from Mt. Precipice The red arrow is pointing to the Church of Annunciation.

A close-up view of the church.

Our tour guide pointed out to us that the gold dome is in the location of the synagogue that Christ would have been teaching in before he got chased out. We didn't visit it and I don't know how they know that.
The inside of the church is actually quite amazing. There are two levels. The lower level has access to the grotto, or cave that is believed to be Mary's home. I'm not sure if it is because we went to the church right after lunch or if because I wasn't expecting anything to be picture worthy, but I didn't have my nice camera so all of the following pictures were taken with my iphone in low light and they are a bit crappy. I apologize.

Nazareth was built on top of stone so scholars believe most residents during Christ's time had a grotto, or cave, that then had stairs that led to more rooms above it. You can see the cave and the stairs behind the altar.

Even more blurry with the zooming in.

This is what the underneath of the dome looks like. It is supposed to resemble a flower, a lily, I believe, which is a symbol in the church for the Virgin Mary.

Excavated remains of an older church. I love the flower details.
From the grotto level, stairs lead to a grand chapel where the walls are decorated with murals sent from around the world depicting the mother and child. I loved the nationalistic ones.

This one is from Japan.

The USA sent a rather abstract mural of Mary, I think.
Outside, underneath the great structure of the church, were the simple ruins of ancient Nazareth. You can see how it was all stone. Our tour guide shared with us here that the Hebrew word from which carpenter was interpreted actually means craftsman and that it is more likely that Christ would have been a type of stone mason but no one really knows.

I ended up really loving this stop and wondered why it wasn't in the original plans. I realize any hint of Mary worship is worrisome in my line of faith, but if you are a Christian, Mary, the mother of Jesus, is a pretty big deal. So is the place where she humbly accepted God's will.
The more I thought about it, the more I wondered why her role in Heavenly Father's plan seems less comfortable for some members of my church to openly honor or praise. As the week progressed and we visited more shops and shooed away street vendor after street vendor, it was obvious there were souvenirs for sale from the Holy Land that interested me and those that did not. Nativity - yes. Crosses - no. Olive wood statue of Ammon and the Title of Liberty (they had a statue at one of the wood shops. They clearly get a lot of LDS visitors) - yes. Statue of Mary - no. Way too catholic, right?
I think I understand where the discomfort comes from and the reasons the leaders of the church have moved away from using and displaying certain icons of Christianity but it makes me a little sad that feeling a connection to one of the few women mentioned in the scriptures whose purpose for being mentioned isn't limited to who she was married to or what child she bore. Clearly, both of those things are probably the only reason we do hear about her but we also know through inference or commentary that she wasn't a whiner (traveling for days on foot and donkey while nine months pregnant? No, thank you), that she worried as a mother would worry about an almost teenager, even knowing Christ was divine, and that she had to watch her son painfully suffer and die. Feeling embarrassed or that it's wrong to freely adore her for her unique earthly mission seems wrong. I guess I think that if we are able to know the difference between having a statue of Ammon on a shelf in our home and worshipping Ammon, we might be able to do the same for Mary. Or Eve. Or Sarah. But, due to lack of revelation or because of revelation, more is known about the masculine members of the Plan of Salvation. I make every effort not to let that bother me and, for the most part, it doesn't. I think being feminine is just as wonderful and divine and we are even told that it is so. We just don't have the same kind of information to pattern our lives after female celestial beings. I am looking forward to a time when we know more.
Throughout the tour, I was able to observe a lot of people from different faiths whose doctrines I do not know. I saw ultra orthodox Jewish men wearing hats with ringlets of hair falling beside each ear. I saw lots of Jewish men wearing a Kippah on their heads. I saw monks wearing simple brown clothes with a rope belt and priests wearing collars.I saw Greek Orthodox men with long beards wearing flat top hats and long black robes. I saw Muslim men wearing designer jeans and t-shirts (I didn't see a single Arab man wearing robes). Some covered their heads with scarves secured with ropes.
I also saw many women from different faiths but there was less variety amongst them. Oh, sure, there were style differences and color preferences (the Jewish people seem to prefer the color black) but a few items of apparel were universal to believers: women covered their hair, covered their skin and wore skirts. Thinking of my own reasons for modesty, I wondered what doctrine within these faiths led women to dress and act the way they do.
I'm never one to expose much skin but it was helpful to visit the Holy Land in the winter because it was easy and comfortable to wear things that covered my arms and legs. Almost all of the holy sites, whether they are Muslim, Christian or Jewish, have rules against wearing anything revealing. Pictures show no swimwear but also no shorts or tank tops. Modesty is key.
It is for me too. I spent a year and a half serving in Young Womens were there was much emphasis placed on dressing modestly. I would say LDS youth, girls especially who are encouraged to cover chests, shoulders, thighs and midriffs, are some of the most conservatively dressed teens today. But, they wouldn't win any kind of conservative dress competition held in Israel. Not with their long, shiny curled hair and wearing those skinny jeans. Not even with a shade shirt underneath a maxi dress (modest sleeve length should come at least to the elbow. My Relief Society jiggle arms love rules like this!)
Our guide explained the reasons for their appearance to us. In Judaism, a woman's hair is considered her "crowning glory" and to show it to anyone but her husband is considered immodest. Muslim women also do not show their hair to anyone other than their husband once they are married. I guess seeing hair is irresistible and too tempting for men. It makes those fundamental polygamous women, with their hair piled on top of their heads behind the bang bump seem almost scandalous. Some ultra conservative Jews even go beyond covering their hair and shave their heads so that their modesty will remain intact. Even more strange than that, to me, is that they can then wear a wig (a head covering) and be considered ok. Huh.
Besides hair being too tempting for men, the area of a woman's body where her legs meet is never to be shown in public. I saw many Muslim women wearing pants but a skirt or long coat was always worn over them. Jewish women preferred long skirts with tights.
In both mosques and synagogues, women and men usually separate during prayers. At synagogue, the women's area is usually a level above and women are behind a prayer screen. In a mosque, women are usually sequestered to a separate place room from men but in some mosques are allowed to pray behind or adjacent to me. I don't know anything about Greek Orthodox but I wouldn't be surprised if they, too, separated by gender while worshipping. I'm very familiar with men and women being separated during sacred worship in my own religion.
After learning the reasons why Jewish women are separated from the men in synagogue, I wondered why other faiths separate by gender during worship. Jewish women are considered unclean during menstration and for 7 days following the end of their period. Until they have immersed in a mikveh, or ritual bath, they cannot sleep in the same bed as their husbands. Our hotels always had two twin beds that could be separated or pushed together. As individual women are not inspected or interviewed about where in their cycles they are, all women are kept separate from men. I guess they consider it being on the safe side of things. I don't know why Muslim women separate but I suspect it's for the same reason. I don't think that's why we separate in the temple but maybe I'm wrong. No one has ever told me. I always thought it was due to the order of things.
It made me think of the story in the New Testament about the woman with an issue of blood touching the hem of Christ's robe. This was a big deal. A man touched by an unclean woman would have also been considered unclean. Two things impressed me more after learning more about how the jewish faith viewed this sort of uncleanliness.
First, that the woman admitted to the touching. She obviously had great faith to believe that her action would have had the result that it did but I think she showed even greater faith to admit to a crowd of Jews what she did. The scriptures admit that she was scared.
Second, I love Christ's reaction and I think there is much to learn from it. Christ knew something had happened. I'm not sure why the laws concerning blood were originally given but he sensed a physical difference when something unclean had touched him. We know that Christ perfectly followed God's laws as well as His will. By law, he could have been angry and vengeful. Instead, he rewarded her faith and ushered in the end of Mosaic law.
After witnessing all of this covering and separating and the various reasons for it, I wondered, "Are we women more than our bodies? Are we more than hair to show or not show and legs to show or not show? Am I more than my uterus?"
I know that I am. I don't deny the unique and essential role women have in childbearing but because we know through revelation that gender is an essential part of our eternal identities, and the promise and hope of becoming like God isn't to become a uniform, sexless being, I know that who I am, as an individual with thoughts and goals and talents and likes and dislikes is important to God. As a female.
I see all these women and though our beliefs, reason and understanding are all different, I respect their faith. We are obedient to what we have been taught, whether it is to cover our shoulders or our hair. We live in communities with traditions and habits. Some wear wigs. Some don't buy crucifixes or Mary icons. But, like a young Mary who was told by an angel what her role on earth would be, we trust that God knows us and loves us and like the woman with the issue of blood, we know He has the power to fix what seems unfixable.